I noticed an article on the BBC news website under the headline “Council faces large crash payout”
Appeal judges have ruled that a council could be liable to pay a mother up to £500,000 in compensation after she crashed on a poorly maintained road. Sussex County Council had argued it was being burdened with an “impossibly high standard” of maintenance in the case. … the nearside wheels of the car had “dropped off” the verge, which was depressed by almost six inches, partly because it was used to park cars by anglers fishing in a nearby river. … Despite driving at 45mph on the rural road, which had a limit of 60mph, the court found Mrs Russell’s speed was “too fast” for the icy conditions and that she was 50% responsible for the crash.
Surely all this will do is to further reduce the budget available to maintain the infrastructure, in times when Councils are already facing massive cuts as a result of the economic downturn.
The money paid out by the council should be used to repair the damaged road, and other damage on roads exacerbated by the winter weather. Otherwise, we enter into a vicious spiral of ever decreasing maintenance on the roads, and ever increasing litigious payouts.
There are plenty of rural roads that have drops at their edges — it is one of the things that one must be aware of when driving — in addition to potholes, bumps, blind summits, and sharp corners, plus water, ice, mud, and animals on the road. Yes, the council should try to rectify these faults as soon as possible, but time and budgets are constrained — and more so if they have to pay out on this case.